<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>prolific.org &#187; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prolific.org/category/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prolific.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1568-2218 &#124; Established 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:46:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pretentious, vous?</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2008/07/06/pretentious-vous/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2008/07/06/pretentious-vous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Various]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceiling cat is watching you masturbate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2008/07/06/pretentious-vous/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metaphors ! = good writing. There&#8217;s nothing more extraordinary than the ordinary. Ceiling cat is watching you masturbate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<ul>
<li>Metaphors ! = good writing.</li>
<li>There&#8217;s nothing more extraordinary than the ordinary.</li>
<li>Ceiling cat is watching you masturbate</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2008/07/06/pretentious-vous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, I won&#8217;t upload your demo to my blog</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2007/09/14/no-i-wont-upload-your-demo-to-my-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2007/09/14/no-i-wont-upload-your-demo-to-my-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2007/09/14/no-i-wont-upload-your-demo-to-my-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 <a href="http://prolific.org/2007/09/14/no-i-wont-upload-your-demo-to-my-blog/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else get asked &#8216;as a member of the blogging community&#8217; to write about a certain social aggregator (and post their demo) by some PR company. All in return for &#8216;a link to your site&#8217;?</p>
<p>I guess today it&#8217;s my time to say <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/plasticbag/1186789736/">I&#8217;m not yer hoor</a>.</p>
<p><font style="font-size: 1em;">I&#8217;m in no way <a href="http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2007/08/this_is_not_a_brothel/">influential</a> here &#8211; and I&#8217;m never quite as ticked off as Tom can get &#8211; but our <a href="http://whedonesque.com/">Whedonesque.com</a> gets quite a bit of traffic and press. That&#8217;s why and where I received the e-mail. I guess our address got on to some kind of list. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve done sweepstakes and contests in collaboration with various companies relevant to our niche audience, but our community blog&#8217;s subject matter is has to pertain to Joss Whedon. We wouldn&#8217;t even allow a post about some random application unless it was somehow relevant to our subject. </p>
<p>So not only do they ask people to shill for them, they ask the wrong people.</font> Fabulous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2007/09/14/no-i-wont-upload-your-demo-to-my-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linking Park</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2007/09/09/linking-park/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2007/09/09/linking-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogrolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mt4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2007/09/09/linking-park/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feedreaders have killed blogrolls, haven&#8217;t they? Well, I&#8217;ve brought them back to this site. There&#8217;s a small, sort of old school blogroll in the right hand column now which contains some fixed staples in my blog diet, some going back &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2007/09/09/linking-park/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedreaders have killed blogrolls, haven&#8217;t they? Well, I&#8217;ve brought them back to this site. There&#8217;s a small, sort of old school blogroll in the right hand column now which contains some fixed staples in my blog diet, some going back to <strike>cabal</strike> pre-blog days. And I&#8217;ve revived my blo.gs and blogrolling lists. They have become a bit long over the years and haven&#8217;t been updated in a long time, so I&#8217;ve put them on separate pages, using MT4&#8242;s new &#8216;page&#8217; feature. I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s the best way to deal with them, but it will have to do for now.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://prolific.org/start/blogs/index.php">Blo.gs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://prolific.org/start/blogrolling/index.php">Blogrolling</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2007/09/09/linking-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last Laugh</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2007/02/20/the-last-laugh/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2007/02/20/the-last-laugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2007/02/20/the-last-laugh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andre Torrez writes: &#8220;I remember when blogs had to be described to people and they would laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and now they have their own blogs.&#8221; Heh. Actually, a lot of them do, but &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2007/02/20/the-last-laugh/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andre Torrez <a href="http://notes.torrez.org/2007/02/links_for_20070_9.html">writes</a>:</p>
<p class="quote">&#8220;I remember when blogs had to be described to people and they would laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and now they have their own blogs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heh. Actually, a lot of them do, but they don&#8217;t stick to it. Very few last longer than a couple of months, tops. I reckon I&#8217;ll be doing this till it&#8217;s desperately old fashioned. For some, it already is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2007/02/20/the-last-laugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That old chestnut again</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2006/05/17/that-old-chestnut-again/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2006/05/17/that-old-chestnut-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 21:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2006/05/17/that-old-chestnut-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We (I&#8217;m talking we as in work, not we as in &#8216;the u2log team&#8217; or, &#8216;the whedonesque.com team&#8217;, or &#8216;me, myself and my royal I&#8217;) launched a new version of one of our most succesful sites yesterday and held a &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2006/05/17/that-old-chestnut-again/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (I&#8217;m talking we as in work, not we as in &#8216;the u2log team&#8217; or, &#8216;the whedonesque.com team&#8217;, or &#8216;me, myself and my royal I&#8217;) launched a new version of one of our most succesful sites yesterday and held a press conference for (mostly)  technology magazines and sites.</p>
<p>Much of this morning was spent passing on URLs, reading the articles and in some cases sending in corrections to the journalist in question.</p>
<p>The one article that stuck out for me, because it captured our product, did not need corrections, contained all the relevant information, written clearly and unambiguously, was the one written by the guy who &#8211; back in the day &#8211; made his name as (one of) the country&#8217;s first / best weblogger(s).</p>
<p>How&#8217;s this for a bold statement: &#8216;webloggers make good journalists&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2006/05/17/that-old-chestnut-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I wish</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2005/10/25/i-wish/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2005/10/25/i-wish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2005/10/25/i-wish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 <a href="http://prolific.org/2005/10/25/i-wish/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;<img src="http://static.flickr.com/23/25822676_789bf55448_t.jpg" style="border: 0pt none ;"><br  /><span style="font-size: 11px;">My <a href="http://eachman.com"  rel='external'>blog</a> is worth <b>$16,371.66</b>.<br  /><span style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://www.business-opportunities.biz/projects/how-much-is-your-blog-worth/"  rel='external'>How much is your blog worth? <br  /><br />
</a><a href="http://www.technorati.com/"  style="border: 0px none ;" rel='external'><img src="http://technorati.com/pix/tech-logo-embed.gif" style="border: 0px none ;"><br  /></p>
<p></a><br  /><br />
The tool uses the <a href="http://www.technorati.com/"  rel='external'>Technorati&#8217;s API</a> using the same link to dollar ratio as the AOL-Weblogs Inc deal. Just to compare, <a href="http://www.business-opportunities.biz/projects/how-much-is-your-blog-worth/whedonesque.com"  rel='external'>whedonesque.com</a>, is worth $311,626.08. Engadget.com is worth $7,708,229.16. <br  /><br />
<br  /><br />
Would I sell whedonesque.com for $311,626.08? Hell yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2005/10/25/i-wish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

