<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>prolific.org &#187; mickey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prolific.org/tag/mickey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prolific.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1568-2218 &#124; Established 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:46:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Journey&#8217;s End &#8211; the Who finale</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2008/07/05/journeys-end-the-who-finale/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2008/07/05/journeys-end-the-who-finale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bastard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heartbeat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mickey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ooh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red dalek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tardis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two doctors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2008/07/05/journeys-end-the-who-finale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any minute now. I hope the spoilers I read were all wrong. Not because I don&#8217;t like them. Just because that would be boring. Here we go! Previouslies. All the doctor&#8217;s companions in danger. Regenerating commences&#8230; *Bops head to Who &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2008/07/05/journeys-end-the-who-finale/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any minute now.</p>
<p>I hope the spoilers I read were all wrong. Not because I don&#8217;t like them. Just because that would be boring.</p>
<p>Here we go! Previouslies. All the doctor&#8217;s companions in danger. Regenerating commences&#8230;</p>
<p>*Bops head to Who tune.*</p>
<p>LOL. Everybody&#8217;s stunned. Nothing seems to have happened.</p>
<p>Ooh, Matrixy effects for the Torchwood gang.</p>
<p>TALK TO THE HAND!</p>
<p>Mickey kisses his big gun. Ooh er, misses.</p>
<p>ROTLFMAO&#8230; Nazi!Daleks. Extermineren, extermineren!</p>
<p>How many times is Donna going to say she&#8217;s a temp? What&#8217;s with the heartbeat? Oooh, the Tardis wants her. </p>
<p>Bastard Red!Dalek&#8217;s killed Jack! </p>
<p>OK. So the spoilers were kind of right. Two doctors, one half human.Gawd, that&#8217;s a whole lot of exposition. Shut up.</p>
<p>Back to Germany.&nbsp; What on earth is going on? Who is that German woman?</p>
<p>Hrmph. This isn&#8217;t half as good as last week. Talk talk talk. Shut up Davros</p>
<p>&#8216;Is that a warp star?&#8217; Captain Cheesecake&#8217;s over acting as usual.</p>
<p>The doctor and his children all gathered as witnesses. </p>
<p>Hmm. I&#8217;m feeling rather bored by this all.</p>
<p>Temp saves the world. Can never know about it. Rose up to her neck in fanfic. Doc alone again, naturally. Wilf ends being the best thing about the episode.</p>
<p>Strike that. The best bit was the Doctor being taken to task over his &#8216;weapons&#8217; by Davros.</p>
<p>I have to say&#8230; Donna&#8217;s fate was Buffy-esque sized heartbreak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2008/07/05/journeys-end-the-who-finale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U2log.com first among many, not money</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2004/11/27/u2logcom-first-among-many-not-money/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2004/11/27/u2logcom-first-among-many-not-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accreditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas gift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irc friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mickey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pocket money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[type humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedonesque]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2004/11/27/u2logcom-first-among-many-not-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just going over to Plasticbag&#8217;s to steal their comment disclaimer for u2log.com when lo and behold, Tom writes: &#8220;U2log.com &#8211; one of the first and best single-subject magazine-style weblogs. I&#8217;m not a great fan of U2, but it&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2004/11/27/u2logcom-first-among-many-not-money/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just going over to Plasticbag&#8217;s to steal their comment disclaimer for u2log.com when lo and behold, <a title="plasticbag.org | weblog | links for 2004-11-27" href="http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2004/11/links_for_20041127.shtml">Tom writes:</a></p>
<p>&#8220;U2log.com &#8211; one of the first and best single-subject magazine-style weblogs. I&#8217;m not a great fan of U2, but it&#8217;s still an impressive site &#8211; and more importantly was created way before Gawker media and the current fad for commercial webloggery. I wonder if it makes any money&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, someone recognises U2log.com. I always feel it&#8217;s been ignored by web pundits &#8212; probably because they find its subject matter distasteful. I think I entered the site into the Webbies twice without being short listed while the much younger and more derivative Whedonesque got in without problems.</p>
<p>Do we make any money? No, we don&#8217;t. We don&#8217;t make any &#8216;big&#8217; money. We make pocket money. Enough for me to buy my many editors a Christmas gift. Enough to pay for bandwidth over-usuage. We&#8217;re probably in the Top 5 U2 fansites, but nowhere near the largest. We get 5000 to 7000 (front)page hits per day and just had our busiest day last week at 23000 page hits.</p>
<p>We started this site as a joke, just some old IRC friends mucking about. Our style reflected this. We were irreverent, with a Brit/Aussie type humour &#8211; unlike any other U2 sites. Always taking the mickey out of the band. These days we&#8217;re rather professional, with press accreditation and access to big events, <a href="http://u2log.com/archive/2004/10/bonos_trek_to_the_city_of_three_kings.php">old skool reporting</a> and what have you, but we&#8217;re still doing it because we&#8217;re obsessive about documenting the band and still in love with the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2004/11/27/u2logcom-first-among-many-not-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

