<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>prolific.org &#187; piece of crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prolific.org/tag/piece-of-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prolific.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1568-2218 &#124; Established 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canal Parade 2005</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2005/08/07/canal-parade-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2005/08/07/canal-parade-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amstel river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsterdam canals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsterdam pride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canal parade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lungs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piece of crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runny nose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sigma 70 200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teary eyes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2005/08/07/canal-parade-2005/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mayor of Amsterdam intervened to give this year&#8217;s canal parade (part of Amsterdam Pride) the go ahead &#8212; there was some fuck up over licenses. I&#8217;ve watched the colorful boats &#8216;n&#8217; floats go by before, but this was the &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2005/08/07/canal-parade-2005/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/caroline/31894543/"  title="Photo Sharing" rel='external'><img src="http://photos23.flickr.com/31894543_972a590b04_m.jpg" alt="gaypride_6290" height="160" width="240"></a><br  /><br />
<br  /><br />
The Mayor of Amsterdam intervened to give this year&#8217;s canal parade (part of <a href="http://www.amsterdampride.nl/index3.htm"  rel='external'>Amsterdam Pride</a>)<br />
the go ahead &#8212; there was some fuck up over licenses. I&#8217;ve watched the<br />
colorful boats &#8216;n&#8217; floats go by before, but this was the first time I<br />
got a good spot at the barrier on <a href="http://www.bmz.amsterdam.nl/adam/nl/bruggen/brug242.html"  rel='external'>Magere Brug</a>.<br />
It&#8217;s near the end of the parade&#8217;s route through the Amsterdam<br />
canals, when the boats hit the Amstel River. All around me people<br />
complained that it wasn&#8217;t as busy as last year (&#8230; that&#8217;s how I got my<br />
spot!) and that the floats weren&#8217;t as good&#8230; I really didn&#8217;t care. It<br />
was chilly and I got rained on a few times, but I stayed glued to my<br />
spot for five hours, snapping away. Despite the fact that I was<br />
coughing my lungs up and couldn&#8217;t see properly with my runny nose and<br />
teary eyes. One thing I learnt was that my gear<br />
isn&#8217;t up to this kind of stuff. I used my Tamron 70-300 4-5.6 and the<br />
85mm/1.8. The 85mm was too short and the Tamron is a piece of crap.<br />
Surprisingly, there weren&#8217;t a whole lot of photographers around where I<br />
stood, but the ones carrying SLR&#8217;s all had top range zooms on them. I<br />
am definitely going to get me that Sigma 70-200/2.8 for this kind of<br />
work.<br  /></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/caroline/sets/710753/"  rel='external'>My Canal Parade set on Flickr</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2005/08/07/canal-parade-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t they know they are the world&#8217;s worst single ever?</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2004/12/09/dont-they-know-they-are-the-worlds-worst-single-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2004/12/09/dont-they-know-they-are-the-worlds-worst-single-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piece of crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple equation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vonbpress.com/2004/12/09/dont-they-know-they-are-the-worlds-worst-single-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a simple equation. &#8216;Do they know it&#8217;s Christmas&#8217; was, miraculously, a good single. No, really, it was. Version &#8217;20&#8242;, however, isn&#8217;t. &#8216;We are the World&#8217; was a piece of crap, so the remake &#8216;We are the future&#8217;, should be &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2004/12/09/dont-they-know-they-are-the-worlds-worst-single-ever/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a simple equation. &#8216;Do they know it&#8217;s Christmas&#8217; was, miraculously, a good single. No, really, it was. Version &#8217;20&#8242;, however,  isn&#8217;t. &#8216;We are the World&#8217; was a piece of crap, so the remake <a title="mtv.com - News - Jermaine Dupri Producing All-Star 'We Are The World' Sequel" href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1494651/20041208/dupri_jermaine.jhtml?headlines=true">&#8216;We are the future&#8217;</a>, should be great.</p>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s unlikely.</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://troubled-diva.com/2004_12_05_troubled-diva_archive.html#110262762068618688">Troubled Diva thinks otherwise</a>. And thinks so lengthily.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2004/12/09/dont-they-know-they-are-the-worlds-worst-single-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

