<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>prolific.org &#187; tahmoh penniket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prolific.org/tag/tahmoh-penniket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prolific.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1568-2218 &#124; Established 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:46:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Watching Whedon&#8217;s Dollhouse</title>
		<link>http://prolific.org/2009/01/23/watching-whedons-dollhouse/</link>
		<comments>http://prolific.org/2009/01/23/watching-whedons-dollhouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dichen lachman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eliza dushku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joss whedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no tags found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tahmoh penniket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedonesque]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prolific.org/?p=10118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the many perks of running Whedonesque.com, is&#8230; Hang on. There aren&#8217;t a lot of perks, really, other than the pleasure of being boss of a site that&#8217;s well respected and much quoted. Yeah, we got invited to the &#8230; <a href="http://prolific.org/2009/01/23/watching-whedons-dollhouse/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9hArFWpPlV4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9hArFWpPlV4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>One of the many perks of running Whedonesque.com, is&#8230;</p>
<p>Hang on. There aren&#8217;t a lot of perks, really, other than the pleasure of being boss of a site that&#8217;s well respected and much quoted. Yeah, we got invited to the Serenity premiere in Los Angeles. But I live in Amsterdam. Which means I never get to go to premieres, conventions, screenings or other meetings. When the Paley Center in New York invited us for a panel discussion on television and online fandom, one of the USA based mods got to go, but I could not. And unlike many of our members, I&#8217;ve never met any of the actors, or Joss. </p>
<p>All of this is perfectly fine with me. Yeah, I run the site, but I also run U2log.com and a couple of other sites. I&#8217;m not the biggest fan, I don&#8217;t keep up with all the news, I don&#8217;t know episode titles by heart, I couldn&#8217;t tell you which of the writers wrote what. I like communities, but I don&#8217;t get too involved. (My pet theory is that people who like to run online communities are actually all mysanthropists deep down.) I consider this a good thing. A little distance from the subject matter is essential. It helps keep me objective. And possibly sane.</p>
<p>I do receive a fuckload of annoying PR in the Whedonesque inbox, all about stuff that means nothing to me, not being American, not living in America. And probably wouldn&#8217;t mean anything to me if I were American, living in America. But I digress. </p>
<p>Perks. I has one. A kind soul gave me access to the Dollhouse screener, which contained an unfinished version of &#8216;Ghost&#8217;, the first episode. In case you&#8217;ve been living in cave, Dollhouse is Joss Whedon&#8217;s new television series for Fox, starring Eliza Dushku and Battlestar Galactica&#8217;s Tahmoh Penikett. You can read a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollhouse_(TV_series)">synopsis of the show</a> on Wikipedia. It is set to premier on February 13.</p>
<p>I remember catching my first glimpse of Buffy on TV (it was the sixth episode of the series&#8217; first season: &#8216;The Pack&#8217;) and feeling compelled to keep watching it, unable to flip to another channel. Like being drawn in by Bob Ross&#8217;s hypnotic voice. </p>
<p><span id="more-10118"></span></p>
<p>Dollhouse didn&#8217;t do that, in fact, the first time I watched it I zoned out several minutes into the first act. I like Eliza Dushku a lot, after all she was my favourite slayer. In this first episode, I think she did ok as &#8216;Caroline&#8217;<strong>*</strong> and as the innocent doll &#8216;Echo&#8217;. She&#8217;s also fairly good as the brazen character she&#8217;s &#8216;imprinted&#8217; with in the first few minutes, but I found her far less believable as the character she becomes next, when she&#8217;s hired to mediate between a kidnapper and the abductee&#8217;s father. In fact, she looked so awkward and miniscule in her skirt suit and specs, it took me right out of the story. And that&#8217;s when the supporting characters began to stand out &#8211; especially on second viewing. </p>
<p>Tahmoh Penikett, playing the FBI-agent Paul Ballard, is as strong as he is as Helo in Battlestar Galactica. Harry Lennix, who plays Echo&#8217;s &#8216;handler&#8217;, doesn&#8217;t get a lot to do in this first episode, but he could be interesting. Amy Acker &#8211; who I never liked as Fred in &#8216;Angel&#8217; &#8211; does a lot with her bit part as the Dollhouse doctor and I immediately wanted to know more about her scar-faced character. The actress who stood out the most, though, is Dichen Lachman. She plays &#8216;Sierra&#8217;, another doll. We catch a few brief glimpses of her throughout the episode, before she makes a striking entrance right at the end of the show. Kick ass, not unlike like Jessica Alba in &#8216;Dark Angel&#8217;, but with more exotic features. I couldn&#8217;t help but wish she&#8217;d been cast as Echo.</p>
<p>Whedon&#8217;s shows are always about the ensemble, and it isn&#8217;t the first time the supporting actors do more for me than the lead. I never liked the character Buffy that much and it took a while for me to take to any of the cast of Firefly, which completely failed to grab me in the first few episodes. So while not exactly confident, I am hopeful the series will prove to be a grower and that Dushku will prove to be as big a talent as Whedon says she is. </p>
<p>* <small>Huh? Yeah, she&#8217;s called Caroline in a flash back, where she is reminiscent of the more vulnerable Faith we sometimes saw in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I&#8217;m just going to pretend Joss named her after me. Indulge me.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prolific.org/2009/01/23/watching-whedons-dollhouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

